Why not paint under a false name?

The gender disparity in art is terrible. So why donā€™t I paint under a nom de pinceau?

Autumn Leaves, Beauchamp Point, is one of the non-nude paintings at the Rye Arts Center’s Censored and Poetic this month.

Last month, when I wrote about the gender disparity in art, a reader asked me why I didnā€™t believe gender-neutral nom de pinceaus were the answer. I promised  Iā€™d answer the question in my following post, but then Russia invaded Ukraine and it seemed like wars and rumors of war were more pressing.

Last night was the opening of Censored and Poetic at Rye Arts Center, which brought the question back to mind.

Kicki Storm, me, and Anne de VillemƩjane at the opening.

The gender disparity is in fact greater than the race disparity in US galleries. According to a 2019 study, an estimated 85% of artists represented on US gallery walls were white, compared to 76.3% in the general population. That is terrible, but a study the prior year found that in 820,000 exhibitions across the public and commercial sectors in 2018, only one third of the works were by female artists. Thatā€™s despite the fact that 51% of the US population is female.*

In general, a name cannot tell you whether a painter is white or black. I had a brief chat about this last night with Matthew Menzies, my former painting student. Matt and I both check a lot of the same sociological boxes. We both have Scottish surnames. However, Mattā€™s not white, although youā€™d never know that until you met him. On the other hand, my given name tells you immediately that Iā€™m female. I can be rejected in the sorting process.

Last night, Kicki Storm referred to a 1989 art project by the Guerrilla Girls called Do Women Have to be Naked to Get Into the Met Museum? which found that less than 5% of the artists in the Modern art section of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York were women but 85% of the nudes were female.

Iā€™d like to say itā€™s better now, but a short comparison of the careers of Lois Doddand Alex Katz reveals otherwise. They have oddly parallel careers. Both studied at Cooper Union. Dodd went on to be one of the founders of the Tanager Gallery. She taught at Brooklyn College and Skowhegan.

The Met owns 19 Alex Katz paintings and three of Lois Doddā€™s, none of which are on view. MoMA owns one Lois Dodd painting, acquired in 2018, when she was 91 years of age. I lost track trying to count how many of Alex Katzā€™ paintings they own; there are 137 records.

In light of this, why not hide behind a gender-neutral set of initials, or, even better, a false name? Because to do so is to capitulate to the world, to agree to its assumption that male painters are superior. If my generation doesnā€™t challenge this assumption, who will?  

Thereā€™s also the stubbornness of identity. I am who I am, for better or ill. Thatā€™s complex; it involves boats and building as much as it does children and grandchildren. Concealing that complexity simply perpetuates gender stereotypes, which I think have gotten more rigid, not less, during my lifetime.

*Every time I read about a massive survey like these, I wonder who has time to count these things.

Iā€™d rather be painting

We donā€™t control our legacy; we just do our best work and hope for the best. But, please, if you love me, donā€™t tell me you like my writing better than my painting.

Pull up your Big Girl Panties, 6X8, is one of the paintings at Rye Arts Center this month.

Next Thursday, I give a short talk at the opening of Censored and Poetic at the Rye Arts Center in New York. It will be livestreamed; you can register here. Iā€™m no stranger to speaking; I generally lecture for 25 minutes each week to my painting classes. That takes me about three hours to research and write.

Cutting that in half increases the prep time exponentially. The more economical the text, the longer it takes to prepare. Certainly, the more emotionally engaged you are with the subject, the more difficult it is to put it in lucid order, and Iā€™m passionate about my subject.

Spring, 24X30, isĀ one of the paintings atĀ Rye Arts CenterĀ this month.

The net result is that Iā€™ve used my entire week writing and practicing my talk. Iā€™ll get out tomorrow for a few hours of plein airpainting in the snow, but thatā€™s only because Iā€™m doing a photo shoot with Derek Hayes.

Iā€™ve spent an inordinate amount of time recently writing. And yet, I donā€™t think of myself as a writer, but a painter. This winter, it seems, Iā€™m a writer whose subject is painting. Or, perhaps Iā€™m a painter who writes.

Itā€™s all very annoying. Iā€™ve spent many years learning the craft of painting and almost none learning to write. That comes as naturally to me as talking.

Michelle Reading, 24X30, isĀ one of the paintings atĀ Rye Arts CenterĀ this month.

All of us carry these labels. I told someone recently that my husband was a programmer. He corrected me, because he isā€”of courseā€”a software engineer. Not being in the profession, I donā€™t understand the difference, but it clearly matters.

Labels can be limiting. Mid-century America used to talk about the ā€˜Renaissance man.ā€™ This was a polymath, a person who was a virtuoso at many things. Thatā€™s very different from the pejorative ā€˜Jack of all trades and master of noneā€™ that we sometimes use to describe a person who canā€™t light on any one thing and do it well.

Polymathy was, in fact, a characteristic of the Renaissance and Enlightenment. Gentlemen (and some ladies) were expected to speak multiple languages, pursue science as a passionate avocation, playĀ musical instruments, and draw competently, all while fulfilling their roles as aristocrats and courtiers. Of course, that was only possible because a whole host of peons (that would be you and me) attended to their every need from birth.

This Little Boat of Mine, 16X20,Ā isĀ one of the paintings atĀ Rye Arts CenterĀ this month.

Having to work and do your own laundry tends to cut into oneā€™s leisure time. In fact, in America, we have an inversion of the historic distribution of leisure. Our elite are workaholics. Wealthy American men, in particular, work longer hours than poor men in our society and rich men in other countries.

This leaves no time to do other things. It also affects our overall culture, since culture is the byproduct of leisure. We used to love highbrow things like classical music and art because the well-educated had time to turn their hobbies into art. Today our culture is much earthier, for good or ill.

Loretta Lynn made a commercial in the 1970s which opened with, ā€œSome people like my pies better than my singinā€™.ā€ I remember that and her 1970 hit single, Coal Minerā€™s Daughter, and, sadly, nothing else of her three-time-Grammy-Award oeuvre.

We donā€™t control our legacy; we just do our best work and hope for the best. But, please, if you love me, donā€™t tell me you like my writing better than my painting.

It was the best of tomes, it was the worst of tomes

Iā€™m flailing around in the undergrowth in this new-to-me medium.

In Control (Grace and her Unicorn), oil on canvas, 24X30, is heading to Rye Arts Center for the month of March.

Last fall, I made the commitment that Iā€™d spend a day a week this winter writing a painting book. That should be easy; after all, Iā€™ve been blogging on the subject since 2007 on this platform (and still earlier on WordPress). Iā€™ve almost as much experience as a writer as I have as a painter. Writing is an ā€˜unconsciously competentā€™ skill for me, or so I thought.

I have an outline and a plan. Thatā€™s the writerly equivalent of a value sketch, right? If I continue with the model of painting, I should then rough out each chapter (my underpainting, in big shapes), and then do a final pass for details.

Saran Wrap Cynic, 24X20, is heading to Rye Arts Center for the month of March

Iā€™m not finding it works that way. I keep forgetting where I am, so I stop to reread what I already have. I then get sucked into editing. But if I forge ahead without checking my place, I inevitably repeat myself.

I need illustrations, especially of the exercises, so I stop to paint them. Thatā€™s probably a mistake, but Iā€™m unsure of myself, blundering ahead.

Iā€™m not clear on how long this book should be. Iā€™ve gotten about 9500 words so far, and you, dear student, have just learned how to transfer your sketch to canvas. Arthur Wesley Dow wrote an exhaustive painting book, but I donā€™t think that will work for modern readers. We like looking at pictures.

Pinkie, pastel, 6X8, is heading to Rye Arts Center for the month of March.

After major surgery eight years ago, I amused myself during my recovery by writing a novel. I had no trouble leaving the hero on the edge of a precipice, taking a nap, and then jumping back to his rescue. Perhaps it was because I was temporarily benched with few other distractions.

I realized that writing just one day a week gives me too much time to forget what Iā€™ve done. Iā€™ve ramped that up to two days a weekā€”just temporarily, mind you, until I find my groove. Thatā€™s definitely helped, but it wipes out any time I have for actual painting. Teaching currently occupies the better part of two days. Marketing owns another.

Ten years ago, Iā€™d have felt terrible about that, as if I was a poseurā€”someone who talks the talk but doesnā€™t walk the walk. Right now, Iā€™m treating it like a necessary evil, and taking my joy in painting the examples for the book.

The paintings are nestled all snug in their beds…

But, if after this predicted Norā€™easterpasses, one of my buddies texts me and says, ā€œCarol, letā€™s go paint snow,ā€ Iā€™m outta here in a flash.

This week, curator Kicki Storm and I worked out the layout for my upcoming show at the Rye Art Center. The paintings are packed and waiting in the middle of my studio. The trailer is ready to roll. Iā€™m chuffed to see these paintings heading down to a larger audience. If youā€™re on my mailing list, Iā€™ll be sending you out the video tomorrow. If not, why not? Email me here, and Iā€™ll fix that.