Iā€™d rather be painting

We donā€™t control our legacy; we just do our best work and hope for the best. But, please, if you love me, donā€™t tell me you like my writing better than my painting.

Pull up your Big Girl Panties, 6X8, is one of the paintings at Rye Arts Center this month.

Next Thursday, I give a short talk at the opening of Censored and Poetic at the Rye Arts Center in New York. It will be livestreamed; you can register here. Iā€™m no stranger to speaking; I generally lecture for 25 minutes each week to my painting classes. That takes me about three hours to research and write.

Cutting that in half increases the prep time exponentially. The more economical the text, the longer it takes to prepare. Certainly, the more emotionally engaged you are with the subject, the more difficult it is to put it in lucid order, and Iā€™m passionate about my subject.

Spring, 24X30, isĀ one of the paintings atĀ Rye Arts CenterĀ this month.

The net result is that Iā€™ve used my entire week writing and practicing my talk. Iā€™ll get out tomorrow for a few hours of plein airpainting in the snow, but thatā€™s only because Iā€™m doing a photo shoot with Derek Hayes.

Iā€™ve spent an inordinate amount of time recently writing. And yet, I donā€™t think of myself as a writer, but a painter. This winter, it seems, Iā€™m a writer whose subject is painting. Or, perhaps Iā€™m a painter who writes.

Itā€™s all very annoying. Iā€™ve spent many years learning the craft of painting and almost none learning to write. That comes as naturally to me as talking.

Michelle Reading, 24X30, isĀ one of the paintings atĀ Rye Arts CenterĀ this month.

All of us carry these labels. I told someone recently that my husband was a programmer. He corrected me, because he isā€”of courseā€”a software engineer. Not being in the profession, I donā€™t understand the difference, but it clearly matters.

Labels can be limiting. Mid-century America used to talk about the ā€˜Renaissance man.ā€™ This was a polymath, a person who was a virtuoso at many things. Thatā€™s very different from the pejorative ā€˜Jack of all trades and master of noneā€™ that we sometimes use to describe a person who canā€™t light on any one thing and do it well.

Polymathy was, in fact, a characteristic of the Renaissance and Enlightenment. Gentlemen (and some ladies) were expected to speak multiple languages, pursue science as a passionate avocation, playĀ musical instruments, and draw competently, all while fulfilling their roles as aristocrats and courtiers. Of course, that was only possible because a whole host of peons (that would be you and me) attended to their every need from birth.

This Little Boat of Mine, 16X20,Ā isĀ one of the paintings atĀ Rye Arts CenterĀ this month.

Having to work and do your own laundry tends to cut into oneā€™s leisure time. In fact, in America, we have an inversion of the historic distribution of leisure. Our elite are workaholics. Wealthy American men, in particular, work longer hours than poor men in our society and rich men in other countries.

This leaves no time to do other things. It also affects our overall culture, since culture is the byproduct of leisure. We used to love highbrow things like classical music and art because the well-educated had time to turn their hobbies into art. Today our culture is much earthier, for good or ill.

Loretta Lynn made a commercial in the 1970s which opened with, ā€œSome people like my pies better than my singinā€™.ā€ I remember that and her 1970 hit single, Coal Minerā€™s Daughter, and, sadly, nothing else of her three-time-Grammy-Award oeuvre.

We donā€™t control our legacy; we just do our best work and hope for the best. But, please, if you love me, donā€™t tell me you like my writing better than my painting.

Weā€™re all emerging artists

Itā€™s not really a question of labels, but of who can work his way through the shifting sands of market change.
More work than they bargained for, by Carol L. Douglas
Recently I had the opportunity for a nice chin-wag with a friend. I donā€™t remember what the subject was, but she told me, ā€œIā€™m just an emerging artist.ā€
This is a term thatā€™s annoyed me since it was first coined. Until weā€™re dead, weā€™d better be emerging, as part of a process of constant growth. We must restlessly seek better galleries, bigger shows, and more important venues, just as we improve our skills.
But what does that mean to gallerists, who sometimes want to show ā€˜emerging artistsā€™ and sometimes want to show ā€˜mid-careerā€™ā€”another meaningless term until weā€™re deadā€”or ā€˜establishedā€™ artists? These are terms that are hardening into acceptance, so it behooves us to think about what the people who bandy them around are trying to say.
The terms have nothing to do with age, and everything to do with experience. You may be 15 or fifty, but if youā€™re just starting out, youā€™re an emerging artist. Youā€™re working, youā€™re probably selling, but you havenā€™t got an inventory of paintings or a settled, consistent practice.
Dinghies, Fish Beach, Monhegan, by Carol L. Douglas
The mid-career artist is someone whoā€™s been doing art for several years, created a body of work, and shown and been recognized. He has had a significant number of solo shows at recognized venues, and been written about in publications. His following is not regional, but national or even global.
A mature artist is one whoā€™s been commodified. His work sells in the secondary market and he has a sales record that supports rising prices.  He is represented in public collections, and by excellent galleries in major metropolitan areas. In short, he is at the pinnacle of career. Sadly, this often means someone with one foot in the grave, as well.
Drying sails, by Carol L. Douglas
The problem with these descriptions is that theyā€™re about success, rather than experience. There are factors involved in success that have nothing to do with skill. Just compare the public recognition of Alex Katz and Lois Dodd. Similar pedigrees, similar experiences, similar skills, and yet heā€™s far more widely recognized than she. And misogyny is justs one factor that comes to play in determining whoā€™s going to be a star.
The art market is just too vast for anyone to categorize painters in this way. Even the greatest landscape painter on the Maine coast or in Santa Fe may mean nothing to a Manhattan dealer who hunts relentlessly for the next enfant terrible to promote. Would he, for example, have a clue who the quiet, reflective Scottish painter James Morrisonis?

Ask the Manhattanite whoā€™s emerging and whoā€™s established, and youā€™re going to get a far different answer than if you ask in, say, Houston. Meanwhile, regional landscape artā€”including plein airā€”sells like mad.

Spring, by Carol L. Douglas
Anyone whoā€™s been selling paintings for a while also recognizes that the whole marketplace is changing rapidly. What happens in the art markets of New York and London is almost completely irrelevant in the decentralized world of painting sales elsewhere, including on the internet. Itā€™s not really a question of whoā€™s emerging or established, and I’d make no business decisions based on what label you think applies to you. Rather, it’s a question of who can work his way through the shifting sands of the current art market.

Challenge your assumptions

This evening I will stroll over to PopUp 265: A Fresh ArtSpace in Augusta for the opening of Barbra Whittenā€™s The Usual Suspects. Since I helped her do the two-person part of her installation a few weeks ago, Iā€™m looking forward to the final project.
A graceful old storefront on Water Street, PopUp265ā€™s plate glass windows act like a kind of fish bowl, magnifying the contents. When I last saw the work, it hadnā€™t spread over the floor yet. How itā€™s going to work with a crowd is an interesting question.

The figures were painted in an intentionally amorphous way, giving the viewer lots of room to personify them in their own imagination. I immediately identified with one who seemed to be dressed in evening wear. I felt uneasy seeing this figure later with a pentagram on her chest, for a pentagram is anathema to my religious values. Will tonightā€™s visitors see past the symbols to personalize the figures, or will they be stopped cold by the symbols? Since this question is at the heart of the work, Iā€™m curious to watch the interactions.
Whitten’s earlier piece, now at the Maine Holocaust and Human Rights Center.
Whitten based her figure on a piece she did six years ago as a student at University of Maine at Augusta (UMA). This piece is currently on exhibit at the Maine Holocaust & Human Rights Center at UMA, in Equal Protection of the Laws: Americaā€™s Fourteenth Amendment.
The piece has particular resonance with the current crisis in American politics, where we seem to be interacting with labels instead of people. As Whittenā€™s artist statement says:
This work invites us toā€¦
ā€¦EXAMINE important issues;
ā€¦REFLECT on our positions;
ā€¦IDENTIFY our values;
ā€¦CHALLENGE our assumptions;
ā€¦ACKNOWLEDGE our prejudices;
ā€¦CONFRONT our fears;
ā€¦RECOGNIZE our shortcomings;
ā€¦ADMIT our failures;
ā€¦ACCEPT responsibility for our choices;
ā€¦CONSIDER alternative viewpoints;
ā€¦ASK difficult questions;
ā€¦SHARE our experiences;
ā€¦EXPRESS our feelings;
ā€¦LISTEN to each other;
ā€¦LEARN from each other;
ā€¦FIND the good in each other;
ā€¦STAND UP for each other;
ā€¦ APPRECIATE our differences;
ā€¦WORK for social justice;
    and
ā€¦CHANGE our world. 

PopUp265 is located at 265 Water Street, Augusta, ME.  There are two artistā€™s receptions: from noon to 1 PM today and 6-7 PM this evening.