A sane estimate of my capabilities

"The Creation of Adam," c. 1508-1512, Michelangelo

ā€œThe Creation of Adam,ā€ c. 1508-1512, Michelangelo
The other day I read a translation of Romans 12:3 that cracked me up: ā€œDonā€™t cherish exaggerated ideas of yourself or your importance, but try to have a sane estimate of your capabilities by the light of the faith that God has given to you all.ā€
I think of myself as a person who can do anything, and I pretty much have done. However, a ā€˜sane estimateā€™ of my capabilities probably ought not continue to include stripping wallpaper. My back is in open rebellion this morning.
My self-worth doesnā€™t lie in the things I make with my hands, but my work is how I spend my days. Would I continue to paint if I were confined to a wheelchair and could no longer scramble around rocks while doing so? I donā€™t know. Would I continue to create if I were blind? I donā€™t know.

"The Ancient of Days in Europe a Prophecy," copy D, 1794, William Blake

ā€œThe Ancient of Days in Europe a Prophecy,ā€ copy D, 1794, William Blake
Would I be less valuable without a strong back or good eyes? No. Would I be happy? Since Iā€™m thrown if the toothpaste is in the wrong drawer, the answer is a decided no.
When I was 40 years old, I ran. I was fit enough to still wear a two-piece bathing suit. That year I had cancer that resulted in a colostomy. Not only was my appliance ugly, uncomfortable and expensive to maintain, but it leaked. Thereā€™s nothing like bowel spillage down your shirt to undermine any sense that youā€™re beautiful or desirable.
Eventually, they were able to reverse my ostomy, but in the time I had it, it changed something in my self-concept. I was no longer powerful and sexy; I was a cancer survivor. Iā€™ve written about shedding that latter self-identity, but Iā€™m afraid these self-images might be like the layers of an onion.
Detail from "The Creation of Adam"

Detail from ā€œThe Creation of Adamā€
I was at a class this week where groups were asked to make posters. I flipped open my phone to Blakeā€™s The Ancient of Days, which, I thought, made the visual point better than anything I might draw. Another person grabbed a marker and translated Blakeā€™s idea to poster form. A third translated it to words. Even though I wasnā€™t drawing, I was still operating within ā€˜a sane estimateā€™ of my abilities.
The Ancient of Days was not intended by Blake to be a portrait of God. He is Urizen, a demiurge. That, in gnostic systems, is an artisan who makes and maintains our physical universe. In our popular imagination, Urizen has come to represent the creative face of God. (Blake was a true seer, subject to visions from the age of four, but he was also a Christian.)
Note the hand holding the compass in The Ancient of Days. It is taut, energetic, and in absolute control.
Detail from "The Creation of Adam"

Detail from ā€œThe Creation of Adamā€
Compare that hand to the hand of God in Michelangeloā€™s The Creation of Adam in the Sistine Chapel. Again, Godā€™s hand is taut and active. Adamā€™s is limp. God is surrounded by the unborn, in a great carapace that resembles a human uterus. Chief among these is Eve. Still in the womb, wrapped in Godā€™s embrace, she looks more lifelike than her future mate. Michelangelo is making a point here: our life force comes from God.
Like life itself, the gifts we have are transitory. Once given, they can be lost again in an instant. They donā€™t totally define us, but they are a part of who we are.