
“[X] might be my favorite of your students,” my husband told me in one of our regularly- repeated conversations. The funny thing is, the identity of X constantly changes.
“I have so many favorites,” I sighed.
“The interesting thing is, there’s no particular ‘type’ among them,” he said.
I get the relationship between math and music, but it also exists between math and the visual arts. But there’s an old canard that ‘arty people’ are not good at math—a leftover from the now-refuted left-brain, right-brain theory. But it means that sometimes my students are afraid of math. While they easily see spatial relationships, they’ve never learned the language of math.
But I’ve had enough students who excelled in science and engineering to know that there’s no conflict between the math-brain and the art-brain. And I myself had math up through multivariable calculus, although I can now barely remember how to figure the area of a circle.
When I was younger and much dumber, I thought there was an artistic type. Naturally, it conformed almost exactly to my personality. “I have never had a lawyer for a student,” I once said. I just hadn’t been teaching long enough; I’ve since had many lawyers in my classes.
The myth of the artistic type
The myth of the artistic type is comforting. You either have it or you don’t. No mess, no uncertainty, no responsibility. And that’s exactly what’s wrong with it.
This usually comes packaged as a look or a temperament: messy studio, emotional intensity, natural talent that just shows up. The artistic type has been part of our culture for so long that we take it for granted. We see it in mass media and the way art is marketed.
It flatters the few and excuses the many. In this worldview, the rest of you are off the hook. You can admire from a distance without risking failure yourselves.

‘Talent’ doesn’t work that way
Talent is the visible result of repeated decision-making. People who draw, paint, compose, or design develop the skills to see or hear relationships. From the outside, that looks like intuition. However, it’s really just experience.
The ‘artistic type’ concept confuses outcome with identity. Someone produces great work, so we assume they must be fundamentally different from the rest of us. They are; they’ve invested years in awkward sketches, bad compositions and failed canvases.
Great painters are not born seeing better than the rest of us. They have trained themselves to pay attention longer. They’ve learned to organize chaos, simplify complexity and edit what doesn’t serve the idea. These are learnable skills that improve through use.
While there’s some comfort in the myth of the ‘artistic type’ or talent, it also keeps people from ever picking up a brush or instrument.
Art is process, and process is teachable. When you replace the question “Am I talented?” with “What interests me enough to learn?” the whole conversation changes.
Want to try painting? I’d love to have you join me for Trust the Process (making technique tell the story you want to tell), my live Zoom class designed to help you build a dependable, joyful, repeatable painting practice. We’ll dig into technique, creative decision-making and the mindset that frees you to paint with confidence. We meet Monday nights, 6-9 PM EST, starting on January 5, 2026. It’s suitable for all levels and all media. You can learn more here.
Registration is now open for workshops in 2026! Reserve your spot:
- Advanced Plein Air Painting | Rockport, ME, July 13-17, 2026
- Sea & Sky | Acadia National Park, ME, August 2–7, 2026
- Find your Authentic Voice in Plein Air | Berkshires, MA, August 10-14, 2026
- New! Color Clinic 2026 | Rockport, ME, October 3-4, 2026
- New! Composition Week 2026 | Rockport, ME, October 5-9, 2026
Can’t commit to a full workshop? Work online at your own pace:















